Assemblies of God Data report

State of the Field: Assemblies of God

Every congregation in the 2024 roster, read against all fourteen GospelGraph layers

This is the reference, not the argument. Every congregation in the Assemblies of God's 2024 roster was placed on the census tract its building stands in, and that tract was read against every national layer GospelGraph holds. What follows is the whole of it, layer by layer, with the national figure beside every number and the base each share is taken against.

Two companion papers draw arguments from this data. Which churches stand on their own (Field Study No. 3) reads the roster through its polity classes. The frontier the PCA is not on (Field Study No. 2) reads three reformed rosters on the same layers. This report is what both stand on, and it includes the layers neither uses.

Three rules govern every figure here. Measures are taken on distinct tracts, not on congregations, because two churches on one street describe one neighborhood. Every share is taken against its own layer's scored base, and the base is stated where it differs from the whole. The national column is the 84,414 tracts of the church-fit index unless a layer says otherwise.

01

The roster, and what joined

The 2024 roster carries 12,700 rows. 11,008 of them, 86.7 percent, landed on a 2020 census tract that the index scores. The 1,692 that did not fall into three groups, and none of the three is random.

Rows that did not join a scored tract
No coordinates in the roster, and geocoding not run
1,563
Connecticut, on the planning-region tract vintage the index does not hold
92
Puerto Rico, which the church-fit index does not cover
37
1,692rows, 13.3% of the roster. Every figure in this report is taken against the 11,008 that joined.

The 11,008 occupy 9,650 distinct tracts. Most hold one Assemblies of God congregation; 1,132 hold two or more, and those tracts account for 2,490 congregations between them.

Assemblies of God congregations per tract
8,518one
964two
132three
22four
9five
5six or more

The roster also carries two structural columns that the rest of this report cuts by. Sixty-six district councils and networks, thirteen of them organised around a language or a culture rather than a territory, holding 1,515 of the placed congregations. And three affiliation classes: 6,428 General Council-affiliated and self-governing, 3,107 District-affiliated and under district oversight, 1,473 Parent-affiliated daughter works.

How much of each layer the 9,650 tracts are scored on
LayerAG tracts scoredShareNational base
Church-fit index: access, need, alignment, churches9,64699.96%84,414
Shalom v2, 2020 and 20249,64899.98%95,837
GIM v3 long-baseline clock9,64999.99%84,414
GDI four-vintage trajectory9,650100%84,414
MVI, built form and posture9,650100%84,414
v4 segmentation and context modifiers9,64899.98%84,415
Neighborhood patterns9,64999.99%84,414
Situation tags9,43597.8%95,837
Field signals5,85260.6%57,412
Field instruments5,02852.1%43,044
Nearest churchless high-need tract9,650100%547 targets

Two layers cover roughly half the roster, and every figure from them below is a share of the tracts they score, not of all 9,650. A blank in either is an absence from that layer, not a zero.

02

Where the churches are

All fifty states and the District of Columbia hold at least one placed congregation. Two states hold more than a thousand.

Congregations placed, by state. The twelve largest and the nine smallest
1,268California
1,220Texas
688Florida
480New York
394Missouri
380Pennsylvania
361Oklahoma
354Washington
316Arkansas
304New Jersey
300Ohio
272Illinois

Fewest: District of Columbia 10, Delaware 19, Vermont 20, New Hampshire 31, Rhode Island 32, Wyoming 33, Maine 38, South Dakota 39, Utah 45.

The fifteen counties holding the most congregations
CountyCongregations
Los Angeles County, CA278
Maricopa County, AZ123
Harris County, TX95
Dallas County, TX91
San Diego County, CA78
Riverside County, CA78
Orange County, CA71
San Bernardino County, CA70
King County, WA70
Sacramento County, CA63
Kings County, NY62
Kern County, CA59
Tarrant County, TX57
Cook County, IL56
Bexar County, TX56

Seven of the fifteen are in California. The language and ethnic districts run the other way: Texas holds 344 of their 1,515 congregations, Florida 212, New York 202, New Jersey 98, and California only 57, because the two large California geographic districts absorb that work directly.

03

Access

The Gospel Desert Index scores how much evangelical gospel witness a tract has structurally within reach, from 0 to 100, higher meaning less access. It is built from congregations and their reach, never from a judgment about faithfulness. The roster sits almost exactly on the national mean.

Access and church density, tract means
MeasureAssemblies of GodNation
GDI (access), mean50.350.0
Churches in tract, mean9.76.8
Miles to nearest other church, mean1.080.96
Tracts with no church at all2.6%11.6%
Tracts in the two worst tiers (GDI 60+)19.1%20.3%
Tracts in the Desert tier (GDI 75+)1.0%1.0%
Access tier, share of tracts
TierAssemblies of GodNation
Watered, 0 to 251.2%1.6%
Sparse, 25 to 4530.3%30.9%
Dry, 45 to 6049.6%46.3%
Arid, 60 to 7518.0%18.9%
Desert, 75 to 1001.0%1.0%
Unscored0.0%1.3%

The tier distribution is the national one to within three points in every band. Where the roster departs from the country is density: the average AG tract holds 9.7 other churches against a national 6.8, and only 2.6 percent of AG tracts hold no church at all against 11.6 percent nationally.

Other churches counted in the tract, distribution across the 9,650 AG tracts
None counted247
One, the AG congregation alone469
Two to five2,851
Six to ten2,822
Eleven to nineteen2,230
Twenty or more1,031
247tracts where the national church data counts no church, including the AG congregation known to be there. That is a gap in the church data, not a finding about presence.
04

Settlement type, built form and viability

The archetype classifies the physical form of a tract. The Ministry Viability Index reads whether that form could hold a gathering: how connected the streets are, how many third places and public rooms there are. Posture combines viability with need into four postures the platform names Plant, Partner, Strengthen and Sustain.

Archetype, share of tracts
ArchetypeAssemblies of GodNation
Suburban54.2%42.8%
Urban, sparse26.0%32.1%
Exurban11.8%12.6%
Urban, dense5.3%7.9%
Rural2.8%4.6%

Eleven points more suburban than the country, and under-represented in every other form. The rural figure is worth stating in its own terms: 2.8 percent of AG tracts against 4.6 percent nationally, and the 1,563 unplaced rows lean rural, so this is a ceiling on the shortfall rather than a floor.

Built form and viability, tract means
MeasureAssemblies of GodNation
MVI composite51.251.2
Street intersection density45.350.0
Third place density45.444.2
Public room density47.547.8
Encounter form, share of tracts
FormAssemblies of GodNation
Thin or fragmented fabric45.6%45.1%
Neighborhood tissue41.6%42.2%
Civic anchor node11.9%11.4%
Commercial encounter node0.9%1.3%
MVI posture, share of AG tracts. Derived rather than cached, so no national column exists
Plant  ·  viable ground, low access33.5%
Partner  ·  fragile ground, low access25.5%
Strengthen  ·  viable ground, reached20.9%
Sustain  ·  fragile ground, reached20.0%
50%is the full bar. A third of the ground the denomination already stands on is what the platform would call Plant ground.

Viability sits exactly on the national mean while intersection density sits five points under it, which is the suburban skew showing through: wider blocks, fewer corners, with third places at the national rate.

05

Need pressure and the eight domains

Need pressure is the weight households are carrying now, built from five Shalom domains. The eight ministry-alignment domains read the same conditions as a call: a higher score means the tract's conditions ask for more of that kind of work. All are scaled so the nation sits at 50.

Pressure and poverty, tract means
Need pressure  Assemblies of God52.7
Need pressure  the nation50.2
14.7%poverty in the average AG tract, against 13.2% nationally. Both figures are tract means, so the difference is in where the churches stand, not in their size.
Ministry alignment, tract means. Nation scaled to 50
DomainAssemblies of GodNationGap
Family stability56.550.0+6.5
Economic opportunity55.249.9+5.3
Health54.550.1+4.4
Education54.250.0+4.2
Environment52.550.0+2.5
Safety and justice51.950.0+1.9
Housing stability49.450.0−0.6
Reconciliation49.150.0−0.9

Six of the eight domains sit above the nation, family stability and economic opportunity furthest. The two that sit below, housing stability and reconciliation, are the two that separate the language districts from the geographic ones most sharply, which section 14 returns to.

06

Shalom, level and change

The Shalom index is a composite wellbeing score by era, 0 to 100, higher meaning better, with three pillars: living, health and hope. It is scored on 95,837 tracts, so its national column is a different base from the church-fit index. Both 2020 and 2024 are read here.

Shalom v2, tract means
MeasureAssemblies of GodNationGap
2024 composite47.349.6−2.3
2024 living pillar46.349.5−3.2
2024 health pillar44.348.2−3.9
2024 hope pillar50.850.3+0.5
2020 composite48.050.4−2.4
Change, 2020 to 2024−0.67−0.76+0.09
Tracts that fell since 202054.7%54.6%+0.1

The roster stands on ground scoring two and a half points below the country on wellbeing, and the shortfall is carried by health, four points down, and living, three points down. Hope sits half a point above. The direction of change is the country's: both fell by about seven tenths of a point across the era and just over half of tracts in each fell at all.

The Shalom domain falling fastest in each tract, share of tracts. From field instruments, 52.1% coverage
DomainAssemblies of GodNation
Justice and protection29.9%29.3%
Life and health29.8%28.7%
Provision and work18.7%19.9%
Household and generations18.6%19.0%
Social fabric3.0%3.1%
−14.4mean size of that steepest fall, against −14.7 nationally.
07

The three clocks

GospelGraph measures change in access three ways, because one measurement of change is easy to fool. Gospel Shift compares two eras. GIM v3 fits a slope across twelve overlapping ACS windows. The GDI trajectory reads four vintages of the access score itself. A fourth reading, the field instruments' direction call, resolves on about half the roster.

Gospel Shift, the two-era clock. Share of tracts
TierAssemblies of GodNation
Opening fast8.4%9.3%
Opening37.8%37.1%
Holding31.9%31.2%
Hardening18.0%17.5%
Hardening fast3.9%4.4%
GIM v3, the long-baseline clock
MeasureAssemblies of GodNation
Change per four years, mean1.371.39
Opening55.6%54.3%
Opening fast12.5%13.6%
Hardening26.2%25.7%
Hardening fast5.8%6.4%
GDI trajectory, the four-vintage clock
MeasureAssemblies of GodNation
Slope per year, mean0.0270.005
Total change across vintages, mean0.160.03
Stable66.3%64.4%
Easing, accelerating9.7%10.6%
Intensifying, accelerating10.5%10.4%
Intensifying, decelerating3.5%3.7%
Easing, decelerating3.4%3.5%
Easing3.2%3.3%
Confidence high99.9%98.7%
Field instruments, direction and pressure. 52.1% coverage; shares are of tracts the layer resolves
MeasureAssemblies of GodNation
Direction: hardening82.0%80.0%
Direction: hardening fast18.0%20.0%
Rising pressure: domain only57.6%56.3%
Rising pressure: confirmed40.2%39.8%
Rising pressure: direction only1.6%3.2%
Rising pressure: none0.6%0.8%
Long exposure15.6%18.6%
Vacancy delta, latest−0.0077−0.0078
Cost burden delta, latest+0.0075+0.0079
Poverty delta, latest−0.0058−0.0048

The activation delta is omitted. Its national mean, −0.54, is dominated by a tail of extreme values and does not describe a typical tract; the AG mean of +0.16 should not be read against it.

All three clocks agree, and they agree that the roster's ground is moving at the country's pace. The one departure is the GDI trajectory slope, 0.027 against 0.005 a year: the access score under AG tracts has been drifting up, meaning slightly less access over the four vintages, by about a sixth of a point in total. It is small, it is consistent with the denomination sitting in suburbs where church counts are stable while population grows, and it is not a trend anyone should plan around yet.

08

Households: thirty segments

The v4 segmentation sorts every American neighborhood into one of thirty core household types by how people live rather than by what they earn, grouped into ten LifeModes. Every tract is a blend, so shares below are weighted by full composition and by household count: a sixty-forty tract counts as both, and a tract of four thousand households counts for four of one thousand. Lift is the AG share divided by the national share; 1.00x is the national rate.

All thirty core segments, ordered by national share
SegmentLifeModeNationAGLift
Affluent Owner Family SuburbsL113.7%11.1%0.81x
Exurban Working HomeownersL113.6%17.1%1.25x
Dense Professional and Solo HouseholdsL110.3%7.9%0.77x
Cost-Pressed Family SuburbsL19.3%10.3%1.10x
Highway Corridor CommutersL96.6%9.5%1.45x
High-Achievement HomeownersL13.7%1.5%0.41x
Established Blue-Collar HomeownersL22.9%4.2%1.42x
Affluent Mature Owner CouplesL52.7%1.5%0.57x
Middle-Income Established HomeownersL52.5%2.5%1.00x
Urban Residential Block HoldoutsL82.5%2.8%1.13x
Affluent New-Build FamiliesL72.3%1.5%0.68x
Young Multifamily WorkersL22.2%2.4%1.08x
Car-Oriented Creative RentersL42.2%1.5%0.66x
Low-Income Solo HoldoutsL102.1%3.1%1.46x
Car-Oriented Working Gateway FamiliesL62.1%3.1%1.45x
Professional Multifamily HouseholdsL52.0%1.0%0.49x
Working New-Subdivision FamiliesL72.0%2.0%1.03x
Multifamily First-TimersL71.9%1.6%0.85x
Crowded Commuter FamiliesL21.8%2.2%1.22x
Industrial-Fringe HomeownersL101.7%2.3%1.34x
Young Urban Working RentersL101.6%1.6%1.00x
Affluent Transit-City CreativesL41.5%0.7%0.46x
Dense Gateway FamiliesL61.5%1.8%1.24x
Crowded Extended-Family HomeownersL51.4%1.3%0.92x
Logistics-Corridor HomeownersL61.3%1.9%1.41x
Transit-Dependent Gateway HouseholdsL61.3%0.9%0.68x
Established Urban Gateway HomeownersL61.2%1.3%1.07x
Dense Solo Gateway RentersL60.8%0.6%0.78x
Garden Apartment Young AdultsL30.7%0.4%0.52x
Bus-Dependent RentersL80.5%0.5%0.95x

The shape is a working-household denomination. Every segment above 1.20x is a working or gateway type: Low-Income Solo Holdouts 1.46x, Highway Corridor Commuters and Car-Oriented Working Gateway Families 1.45x, Established Blue-Collar 1.42x, Logistics-Corridor 1.41x, Industrial-Fringe 1.34x, Exurban Working 1.25x. Every segment below 0.60x is affluent or professional: High-Achievement Homeowners 0.41x, Affluent Transit-City Creatives 0.46x, Professional Multifamily 0.49x, Garden Apartment Young Adults 0.52x, Affluent Mature Owner Couples 0.57x.

Two gateway types run under the national rate and are worth naming so the gateway story is not overstated: Transit-Dependent Gateway Households at 0.68x and Dense Solo Gateway Renters at 0.78x. The denomination reaches gateway families who drive. It is thinner among gateway households who do not.

LifeMode of the dominant segment, share of tracts
LifeModeAssemblies of GodNation
L1  Family suburbs and exurbs50.1%52.1%
L6  Gateway11.0%9.4%
L9  Corridor commuters9.7%6.8%
L2  Working established7.6%6.0%
L5  Established and mature5.8%8.3%
L10  Holdouts and fringe5.7%4.6%
L7  New-build4.3%5.2%
L8  Urban residential3.5%3.4%
L4  Creative renters1.9%3.3%
L3  Young adult apartment0.3%0.9%
Context modifiers, share of tracts carrying each
ModifierAssemblies of GodNation
Public housing community20.5%15.4%
Elevated chronic-health burden16.3%12.8%
Household crowding pressure14.4%11.4%
Long-commute rhythm13.1%14.1%
Displacement pressure12.4%11.7%
Military-adjacent10.8%11.2%
Limited-English concentration7.6%5.4%
Farmworker concentration4.1%1.9%
Renter cost pressure2.6%2.9%
Retirement-community profile1.6%1.9%
University-town context1.5%2.3%
HBCU-adjacent1.1%2.2%

Farmworker concentration is the modifier the roster over-indexes on most, at more than twice the national rate, followed by public housing and chronic-health burden. It under-indexes on university towns and HBCU-adjacent tracts by about half.

Demographics, tract means
MeasureAssemblies of GodNation
Child share of population22.5%21.4%
Elderly share17.5%17.6%
Working-age share60.0%60.9%
Family household share65.1%64.7%
Racial diversity index0.5250.528
Age diversity index0.8360.817
Households per tract1,669—

The single-household share and the language-diversity index are unpopulated in both the dump and the national demographics cache at this release, and are not reported.

09

Field signals

Field signals are a composite watch score with a tier and a set of flags, scored on 57,412 tracts nationally and 5,852 of the roster's, which is 60.6 percent. Every share in this section is of the tracts the layer scores.

Signal score and tier
MeasureAssemblies of GodNation
Signal score, mean47.949.8
Tier: watch70.2%70.6%
Tier: hot21.1%22.7%
Tier: positive8.7%6.7%
Signal flags, share of scored tracts carrying each
FlagAssemblies of GodNation
Thin presence69.1%74.2%
Daytime isolation55.0%65.2%
Housing pressure55.0%53.7%
Accessible desert12.7%14.8%
New activity9.8%7.7%
Easing5.3%4.9%
Intensifying5.3%4.8%
School-age pressure4.1%3.7%
Displacement risk1.4%1.4%

The roster runs cooler than the country on this layer: fewer hot tracts, more positive ones, and ten points less daytime isolation, which is what a suburban roster with good church density looks like from here. New activity runs two points above the nation.

10

Twenty-four neighborhood patterns

Each tract is read for twenty-four neighborhood patterns, each in one of four states. Ten of the twenty-four are risk-named, where present means the hazard is realised rather than that the fabric is intact; those ten are swapped before counting, so every row below is the share of tracts where the pattern is unhealthy. Risk-named patterns are marked.

Share of tracts where the pattern is unhealthy, ordered by national rate
PatternAssemblies of GodNationGap
Household mix100.0%100.0%0.0
Children in the city100.0%100.0%0.0
Old people everywhere99.7%99.3%+0.4
Life cycle99.5%99.3%+0.2
Neighborhood tissue85.7%85.6%+0.1
Stable family anchor86.7%84.5%+2.2
Social belonging79.2%78.1%+1.1
Caregiver pressure *76.9%72.5%+4.4
Community fragmentation *74.2%71.5%+2.7
Family pressure *69.7%65.9%+3.8
Civic anchor node67.3%64.9%+2.4
Activity nodes66.5%63.6%+2.9
Small public squares65.9%62.8%+3.1
Mosaic of subcultures61.9%61.5%+0.4
Network of paths64.6%57.7%+6.9
Burnout belt *57.8%57.0%+0.8
School-age pressure *53.9%50.8%+3.1
Under-resourced *46.6%50.1%−3.5
Third-space deficit *49.3%49.7%−0.4
Car-dependent exurb *48.6%49.5%−0.9
Identifiable neighborhood2.3%4.8%−2.5
Elder isolation *0.2%0.4%−0.2
Transient renters *0.0%0.1%−0.1

* risk-named, polarity swapped before counting. Bilingual households is the twenty-fourth pattern and is not scored as a health state.

The fabric under the roster is the country's fabric, to within a few points on every row. The one pattern that departs by more than five is network of paths: 64.6 percent of AG tracts lack a walkable network of routes against 57.7 percent nationally, seven points worse. That is the suburban skew from section 4 read from the ground. Caregiver pressure and family pressure sit about four points worse; under-resourced sits three and a half points better.

11

Situation tags

Situation tags are threshold flags raised when several layers agree on a condition. They resolve on 95,837 tracts nationally and 9,435 of the roster's, 97.8 percent.

Share of tracts carrying each tag
TagAssemblies of GodNationRatio
Thin church ecology56.0%62.9%0.89
Housing fragility33.7%36.9%0.91
Rising need19.8%13.6%1.46
Daytime isolation14.1%24.1%0.59
Majority-minority11.8%9.8%1.20
Gospel absence11.8%6.8%1.74
Pressure rising11.7%11.9%0.98
Accessible desert9.5%11.1%0.86
Conditions improving8.5%8.9%0.96
Health crisis7.3%4.8%1.52
Compound stress7.2%5.6%1.29
Mercy entry indicated6.3%4.2%1.50
New church activity5.4%4.6%1.17
Chronic disinvestment5.4%3.9%1.38

This is the layer where the roster looks least like the country. Gospel absence is raised on AG tracts at 1.74 times the national rate, health crisis at 1.52, mercy entry at 1.50, rising need at 1.46, chronic disinvestment at 1.38. All five are flags for hardship. The tags that run under the national rate, thin church ecology, daytime isolation and accessible desert, are flags for emptiness. The roster stands where things are hard and where churches already are, and this layer says both at once.

12

The nearest churchless high-need tract

547 tracts in the country hold no church in the merged church data and carry need pressure above 70. For every congregation, the pipeline finds the nearest one, centroid to centroid. Distance is straight-line, so it gives direction and rough scale rather than a drive time.

Distance from each congregation to the nearest churchless high-need tract
Median distance
28.8 mi
Congregations within one mile
271
Within five miles
1,823
Within fifteen miles
3,924
Within thirty miles
5,600
16.6%of the roster is within five miles of one. 35.6% is within fifteen. 488 of the 547 target tracts are the nearest for at least one AG congregation.
The ten target tracts that are nearest for the most congregations
TractPlaceCongregations
53053071416Pierce County, WA624
05143011105Washington County, AR322
27053104801Hennepin County, MN218
29189213301St. Louis County, MO199
05119980200Pulaski County, AR182
24005490605Towson, Baltimore County, MD144
01097001502Mobile County, AL132
06087100400Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz County, CA126
25025160602Chelsea, Suffolk County, MA120
12077980000Liberty County, FL114

A single tract in Pierce County, Washington is the nearest churchless high-need tract for 624 Assemblies of God congregations, because the Northwest holds few of the 547 and many AG churches. Read this table as a map of where the targets are sparse rather than as a queue.

13

The opening frontier

The Desert Moved defined the fastest-opening ground in the country: tracts that GIM v3 confirms are opening, sit at GDI 60 or above, and score 50 or above on viability. There are 2,186. Its mirror is the ground hardening with a church already inside: 3,185 tracts.

The roster against the frontier and its mirror
Congregations standing in an opening desert
236
Share of the roster
2.1%
Opening deserts with an AG church
212
Opening deserts with no AG church
1,974
Opening deserts with no church of any kind
518
Congregations in the mirror
477
Mirror to frontier ratio
2.0 : 1

The household lift below is the one figure in this report weighted by congregation rather than by tract, because it is quoted from The frontier the PCA is not on on that paper's basis so the two can be read together. The differences from the tract-weighted table in section 8 are small and in the second decimal.

Household lift on the frontier's own types, congregation-weighted
Household typeAG lift
Over-represented among the unreached
Car-Oriented Working Gateway Families1.53x
Industrial-Fringe Homeowners1.37x
Exurban Working Homeowners1.23x
Working New-Subdivision Families1.06x
Bus-Dependent Renters1.05x
Affluent New-Build Families0.67x
The three types the published analysis calls reached
Highway Corridor Commuters1.40x
Young Multifamily Workers1.08x
Middle-Income Established Homeowners0.98x
14

Two ways to cut the roster

Every table above is the roster as one body. The roster carries two columns that divide it, and both divisions are larger than most of the differences between the roster and the country. The argument built on them is in Field Study No. 3; the figures are here.

By polity type. Thirteen language and ethnic districts against fifty-three geographic ones. 240 tracts hold both
MeasureLanguageGeographicNation
Congregations / distinct tracts1,515 / 1,4149,493 / 8,476—
Access (GDI)49.650.350.0
Need pressure56.752.150.2
Poverty17.9%14.2%13.2%
Churches in tract8.59.96.8
No church at all4.2%2.2%11.6%
Shalom 2024 composite43.247.949.6
Shalom hope41.452.250.3
Shalom health49.743.548.2
Shalom change 2020 to 2024−0.68−0.68−0.76
MVI55.350.751.2
Intersection density56.143.850.0
Plant posture46.0%31.8%—
Alignment: reconciliation59.547.850.0
Alignment: housing stability57.948.250.0
Rural / exurban0.3% / 4.9%3.1% / 12.8%4.6% / 12.6%
Urban dense / urban sparse11.3% / 41.1%4.4% / 23.8%7.9% / 32.1%
Car-Oriented Working Gateway lift2.99x1.20x1.00x
Limited-English concentration21.1%5.5%5.4%
Signal tier: hot14.9%22.0%22.7%
Tag: gospel absence8.0%12.4%6.8%
Tag: majority-minority20.7%10.5%9.8%
Pattern: mosaic of subcultures unhealthy38.1%65.3%61.5%
Pattern: under-resourced59.1%44.9%50.1%
Median miles to churchless high-need tract11.933.0—
Frontier: share in an opening desert2.6%2.1%—
Self-governing share37.8%61.7%—
By affiliation class. 657 tracts hold a self-governing and a dependent congregation together
MeasureGeneral CouncilDistrictParentNation
Congregations / distinct tracts6,428 / 6,1013,107 / 2,9361,473 / 1,374—
Access (GDI)50.051.149.550.0
Need pressure51.954.752.850.2
Poverty14.0%16.3%15.0%13.2%
No church at all1.9%2.8%4.8%11.6%
GDI 60+18.3%21.9%16.5%20.3%
Shalom 2024 composite48.145.347.249.6
Shalom change 2020 to 2024−0.73−0.48−0.74−0.76
MVI51.051.153.251.2
Suburban / rural57.3% / 2.5%47.6% / 3.8%49.6% / 1.0%42.8% / 4.6%
Plant posture31.6%37.1%35.9%—
Median miles to churchless high-need tract30.827.921.9—
Frontier: share in an opening desert2.1%2.5%1.8%—
15

Against the other rosters

Three other denominations went through the same pipeline. All four columns below are tract means on distinct tracts, computed the same way, so they can be read across.

MeasureAGPCAARPOPCNation
Congregations placed11,0081,734256334—
Distinct tracts9,6501,67424333184,414
States with a church50502344—
Access (GDI)50.346.148.146.150.0
Need pressure52.748.550.745.150.2
Poverty14.7%12.1%12.2%9.9%13.2%
Churches in tract9.710.816.58.56.8
Miles to nearest church1.080.570.600.770.96
MVI51.255.650.554.851.2
Suburban54.2%52.8%57.6%56.5%42.8%
Exurban11.8%8.8%19.8%8.5%12.6%
Rural2.8%1.5%2.9%1.2%4.6%
Urban dense5.3%6.8%2.1%3.0%7.9%
Access tier: Watered1.2%3.0%2.1%2.1%1.6%
Access tier: Arid18.0%10.9%19.8%7.9%18.9%
Access tier: Desert1.0%0.5%0.0%0.0%1.0%
Share in an opening desert2.1%1.6%2.3%0.6%—
Opening deserts covered, of 2,1862122562—
Mirror to frontier ratio2.02.01.73.5—

The Assemblies of God is the only one of the four standing on ground with more need than the country, the only one at the national access mean rather than below it, and the only one with a Desert-tier share equal to the nation's. It is also, with the ARP, the only one whose Arid share is at the national rate. Every roster is twice as likely to be where ground is hardening with a church already in it as where it is opening with none.

16

What this cannot say

13%1,692 roster rows are not in any figure. 1,563 carried no coordinates and geocoding was not run against them; 92 are Connecticut congregations on the planning-region tract vintage the index does not hold; 37 are in Puerto Rico. The Connecticut and Puerto Rico rows are a known vintage and coverage gap. The 1,563 are the material one, and they are not a random sample: rosters lose rural addresses first.
2Two layers cover about half the roster. Field signals score 60.6% of AG tracts and field instruments 52.1%. Every figure from them is a share of the scored tracts. Nothing here should be read as a claim about the unscored half.
247Churchless is not unreached. 247 AG tracts show zero churches in the national church data despite the AG congregation known to be there, so the church data has gaps and any "no church at all" figure in this report is partly a coverage artifact.
—Two ACS columns are empty. The single-household share and the language-diversity index are unpopulated in both the dump and the national cache at this release and were not reported rather than reported as zero.
—Two bases appear. Every table is tract-deduplicated except the frontier household lift in section 13, which is congregation-weighted so it matches the companion paper it is quoted from. The differences are in the second decimal and are noted where they occur.
—The roster carries no dates. This is one snapshot. Whether any figure here is rising or falling for the denomination cannot be answered from it.
—Nothing here counts ministry. No members, attendance, giving, conversions or health. It is where the buildings are and what kind of ground surrounds them. A church on hard ground is not thereby faithful and a church on comfortable ground is not thereby compromised.
A1

How to reproduce every figure

1denom:dump joins all fourteen layers to the roster, one row per congregation, 161 columns.
2denom:gap appends the nearest churchless high-need tract to every row.
3denom:audit produces sections 1 through 12. With --by network --match it produces the polity-type table, and with --groupby affiliation the affiliation table.
4denom:frontier produces section 13, and denom:field the state and county counts in section 2.

The saved runs behind this report are ag-full-layer-audit.txt, ag-affiliation-audit.txt, ag-frontier.txt and ag-state-of-field.json in design/denominations/, with the scripts and column dictionary in README.md and RUNBOOK.md beside them.